Mustanski BS. Are intimate partners met online associated with HIV/STI risk behaviours? Retrospective and day-to-day journal information in conflict. AIDS Care. 2007;19:822–7.

Mustanski BS. Are intimate partners met online associated with HIV/STI risk behaviours? Retrospective and day-to-day journal information in conflict. AIDS Care. 2007;19:822–7.

Mustanski BS. Are intimate partners met online associated with HIV/STI risk behaviours? Retrospective and day-to-day journal information in conflict. AIDS Care. 2007;19:822–7.

  • CAS
  • Article
  • PubMed
  • Bing Scholar
  • 3.

    Liau the, Millett G, Marks G. Meta-analytic study of on line sex-seeking and intimate risk behavior among males that have intercourse with males. Intercourse Transm Dis. 2006;33:576–84.

    Bull SS, McFarlane M. Soliciting intercourse on the web: which are the dangers for sexually diseases that are transmitted HIV? Intercourse Transm Dis. 2000;27:545–50.

    • CAS
    • Article
    • PubMed
    • Bing Scholar
  • 5.

    Benotsch EG, Kalichman S, Cage M. Guys who possess met sex lovers through the online: prevalence, predictors, and implications for HIV avoidance. Arch Intercourse Behav. 2002;31:177–83.

    Halkitis PN, Parsons JT. Intentional sex that is unsafebarebacking) among HIV-positive gay males whom look for intimate lovers on the web. AIDS Care. 2003;15:367–78.

    • CAS
    • Article
    • PubMed
    • Bing Scholar
  • 7.

    Bolding G, Davis M, Hart G, et al. Gay males whom try to find intercourse on the net: will there be more HIV/STI risk with online lovers? AIDS. 2005;19:961–8.

    Davis M, Hart G, Bolding G, et al. Intercourse while the online: homosexual guys, danger decrease and serostatus. Cult Wellness Intercourse. 2006;8:161–74.

    Fogarty AW. A contrast of styles into the health insurance and behaviour that is sexual of negative and HIV positive homosexual guys 2002–2005. Sydney: nationwide Centre in HIV Social analysis, The University of the latest South Wales; 2006.

    Hospers HJ, Kok G, Harterink P, et al. A new conference destination: chatting on the net, e-dating and sexual risk behaviour among Dutch males that have intercourse positive singles login with men. AIDS. 2005;19:1097–101.

    Rosser BR, Oakes JM, Horvath KJ, et al. HIV risk that is sexual by males whom make an online search to look for intercourse with males: link between the Men’s Web Intercourse Study-II (MINTS-II). AIDS Behav. 2009;13:488–98.

    Horvath KJ, Oakes JM, Rosser BR. Sexual negotiation and HIV serodisclosure among males who possess intercourse with guys using their online and offline lovers. J Urban Wellness. 2008;85:744–58.

    Lewnard JA, Berrang-Ford L. Partner that is internet-based and danger for unprotected rectal intercourse in intimate encounters among males that have intercourse with guys: a meta-analysis of observational studies. Sex Transm Infect. 2014;90:290–6.

    Newcomb ME, Mustanski B. Racial variations in same-race partnering while the results of intimate partnership faculties on HIV danger in MSM: a potential intimate journal research. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2013;62:329–33.

    Matser The, Heijman T, Geskus R, et al. Perceived HIV status is an integral determinant of unprotected intercourse that is anal partnerships of males who’ve intercourse with males in Amsterdam. AIDS Behav. 2014;18(12): 2442–56.

    Van den Boom W, Stolte we, Sandfort T, et al. Serosorting and sexual danger behaviour relating to various casual partnership types among MSM: the research of one-night stands and intercourse buddies. AIDS Care. 2012;24:167–73.

    Heijman RL, Stolte IG, Thiesbrummel HF, et al. Opting out increases HIV screening in a sizable intimately transmitted infections outpatient center. Intercourse Transm Infect. 2009;85:249–55.

    • CAS
    • Article
    • PubMed
    • Bing Scholar
  • 18.

    Heymans R, Matser The, Bruisten SM, et al. Distinct Neisseria gonorrhoeae transmission networks among males that have intercourse with guys in Amsterdam, holland. J Infect Dis. 2012;206:596–605.

    Fernandez-Davila P, Zaragoza LK. Online and intimate danger in males who possess intercourse with males. Gac Sanit. 2009;23:380–7.

    Ross MW. The net as a medium for HIV avoidance and guidance. Focus. 2002;17:4–6.

    Bolding G, Davis M, Hart G, et al. Where young MSM meet their first partner that is sexual the role for the online. AIDS Behav. 2007;11:522–6.

    Van den Boom W, Konings R, Davidovich U, et al. Is serosorting effective in decreasing the chance of HIV illness among males that have sex with guys with casual intercourse partners? J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2014;65:375–9.

    Acknowledgements

    The writers thank all scholarly research individuals, users of the analysis group, and staff associated with the STI outpatient center because of their cooperation, Olivia Landen for assisting with analysis, and Claire Buswell for modifying the manuscript.

    Funding

    This work ended up being funded because of holland organization for Health Research (ZONMW) (grant number 125010008)

    Accessibility to information and materials

    Data employed for this research can be obtained on demand through the author that is last.

    Writers’ contributions

    The study that is original ended up being compiled by MSVDL, RG, MX. TH and UD contributed significantly towards the design for the research protocol. TH and MSVDL had been accountable for execution for the research and recruitment associated with the participants. MSVDL performed the analytical analysis. IS, MS, TH, UD and RG interpreted the information. TH penned the manuscript; MSVDL, MX, RG, UD and it is revised the manuscript. All writers had complete use of the info into the research, and read, revised and approved the manuscript that is final.

    Contending passions

    The writers declare they have no interests that are competing.

    Consent to write from people

    Ethics approval and permission to take part

    The analysis had been authorized because of the medical ethics committee for the Academic clinic of Amsterdam (MEC 07/181), and written consent that is informed acquired from each participant.

  • No Comments

    Post A Comment