Asian solamente feminine travellers are challenged by gendered and racialised dangers.
Gender intersects with competition in amplifying women that are asian perception of danger.
Risks are conceptualised because the unequal power relations tourism space that is underlying.
Feminine travellers gain reconstruct and empowerment identities through risk-taking.
Specific empowerment may extend to social transformations at a level that is micro.
This study explores how Asian women perceive and negotiate the risks of travelling alone and the meanings of these processes in response to the emergence of the solo female travel market in Asia. The lived experiences of 35 solo feminine travellers from 10 East and Southeast parts of asia were analysed constructivist that is using concept. The findings expose that Asian solamente female travellers had been concerned with gendered ( ag e.g. Sexual street and assault harassment) and racialised (e.g. Discrimination and social disapproval) dangers, which imply the unequal energy relations underpinning the gendered and tourism space that is racialised. The findings additionally expose evidence where sex intersects with competition in amplifying and constructing Asian ladies’ perception of danger. The research demonstrates exactly how Asian solo feminine travellers gained empowerment and experienced self-transformations through negotiating the potential risks and additional reveals just just how these specific transformations may expand to social transformations at a micro level in an context that is asian.
Past article in problem
Next article in problem
Dr Elaine Chiao Ling Yang is a co-employee Lecture when you look at the Department of Tourism, Sport and resort Management, Griffith University. A PhD is held by her in Tourism from Griffith University. Elaine’s research interest is based on the aspects of Asian tourism, feminine travellers and tourist danger perception. Her works have already been posted in Tourism Management, Journal of Travel Research, Current Issues in Tourism, and Journal of Hospitality Marketing and Management. Elaine can be an editorial board user of Tourism Management views and Annals of Leisure analysis. She actually is additionally a volunteer administrator of females Academics in Tourism (WAiT).
Share: Elaine Yang contributed towards the conception and design of this project, literature review, information collection, analysis and interpretation of information, drawing implications and conclusion, drafting and revising the manuscript, handling reviewers’ commentary and communication utilizing the log.
Dr Catheryn Khoo-Lattimore is just A senior lecturer at griffith University, Australia. Catheryletter’s research interest is on tourist and visitor behaviour, with a separate concentrate on females, families and young kids as well as on understanding these portions from a perspective that is asian. Catheryn has co-published two publications: Asian Genders prettybrides in Tourism and ladies and Travel. Catheryn is Editor-in-Chief of Tourism Management views and serves in the editorial panels of some other hospitality and tourism journals. This woman is Vice-Chair that is second of Council for Australasian Tourism and Hospitality Education (CAUTHE). She actually is additionally the founder and chair of females Academics in Tourism (WAiT).
Contribution: Catheryn Khoo-Lattimore contributed input that is intellectual the entire task including methodology and literary works review, and subsequent critical revisions of numerous drafts for the manuscript.
Associate Professor Charles Arcodia may be the Deputy Head associated with the Department of Tourism, Sport and resort Management at Griffith University, Australia. Charles’s research passions are often in the area of occasion management and explore several associated areas such as for example tourism administration training and heritage management that is cultural. He’s also the Executive Editor regarding the Overseas Journal of Event Management analysis and it is an editorial board user of five other scholarly journals.
Share: Charles Arcodia contributed into the conception and design associated with the scholarly study; the interpretation regarding the information and also the conclusions drawn from this; reviews associated with the draft paper; and interpretation of this reviewers’ feedback, and reaction to the reviewers.